Back to Office actions

What does it mean if my trademark is dismissed for being geopraphically deceptively misdescriptive?

Senior Trademark Attorney

It means the examiner has determined the mark contains a geographic term that falsely implies the goods or services originate from a specific location when they do not, and that this false implication would be material to consumers' purchasing decisions.

"Paris Star" for clothing not made in France could receive this refusal because the Paris connection implies French manufacturing, which may be a material quality consideration for clothing consumers. The refusal is not that the mark is geographically descriptive; it is that it is geographically misleading in a way that would deceive consumers.

This is a permanent bar to registration on both the Principal and Supplemental Registers; acquired distinctiveness cannot overcome it.

Related questions

Answering all your trademark concerns

Many entrepreneurs still consider trademark registration to be the least important step in the process of establishing their brand. This can become a big issue. Not registering a trademark from the start leaves a company vulnerable to potential copycats and other forms of brand infringement that can significantly damage its reputation and hamper growth.

World Cup Qatar 2022 trademark dispute between FIFA and PUMA ended with a draw

Trademark battle between FIFA and the PUMA regarding the upcoming soccer World Cup in Qatar led to cancelation of trademarks of both parties. This case highlights yet another gray area of trademark laws: the risky practice of registering sporting events as trademarks

Trademarks filed in bad faith: the case of Tesco vs Lidl

Bad Faith trademark filings worldwide have increased significantly over the past years. And while the problem persists, the trademark lawyers still struggle to define consistent minimum acceptable standards for dealing with bad faith trademark applications. Resolution of the ongoing dispute between Lidl and Tesco could have significant implications for future rulings concerning bad faith trademark registrations.