PUMA SE v. JOSÉ A. ALFONSO ARPÓN, S.A.

PUMA SE

Case details

Plaintiff: PUMA SE

Case no.: R2991/2019-1

Jurisdiction: European Union

Industry: Fashion

Decision date: 04 Jun, 2021

Decision

There is a high probability that the use of the contested sign for identical goods for which the earlier mark is highly reputed would take unfair advantage of the high degree of reputation of the earlier trade mark and the investments undertaken by the opponent to achieve that reputation. For example, the use of the contested sign in relation to footwear could be more attractive for consumers, due to the reputation of the earlier mark and, therefore, could facilitate the marketing of the contested goods, or the applicant may unfairly benefit from the reputation of the earlier mark (especially where the mark applied for has no meaning).

Comparison of Trademarks

PUMA